Rex Murphy: Trudeau's handling of Afghanistan is our great national shame

Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau delivers a speech as he visits Nafisa Middle Eastern Cuisine restaurant during his election campaign tour in Mississauga, Ontario, Canada August 27, 2021. PHOTO BY CARLOS OSORIO /Reuters

 

This election may have begun as an opportunistic whim of a self-involved prime minister, but it is clearly something else now. One presumes that the PMO, despite the raging pandemic, thought that a Canadian election in August, with the Liberals riding high in the polls and the PM’s approval versus other leaders high as well, it would be a romp. I’m not talking about Chrystia Freeland’s dive into amateur-film making, particularly the kind that doctors a public statement to say the exact opposite of what the statement actually imports. To have her revealed as just another misleading politician doesn’t help the cause, and actually contributes to the growing impression the Liberals are running scared.

Why investors should care about monetary policy, even if Trudeau doesn't

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau shrugged off a recent question asking if he believed the Bank of Canada’s mandate was in need of a change. PHOTO BY ANDREJ IVANOV/REUTERS FILES

 

Read the original article.

In the meantime, our consumer price index gained 3.7 per cent in July compared to a year earlier, the highest level in a decade. But don’t you worry, as it’s all transitory, according to our existing government and the Bank of Canada. In particular, we really don’t know how a middle- or lower-income family can make a go of it in cities such as Vancouver or Toronto where housing prices are as high as 15 times average income levels. We recently read that there are now bidding wars for rental units in those two cities.

Having SARS-CoV-2 once confers much greater immunity than a vaccine - but no infection parties, please

A Jerusalem health care worker in January prepares a dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine designed to prevent COVID-19. AHMAD GHARABLI/AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES

 

Read the original article.

The natural immune protection that develops after a SARS-CoV-2 infection offers considerably more of a shield against the Delta variant of the pandemic coronavirus than two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, according to a large Israeli study that some scientists wish came with a «Don’t try this at home» label. The newly released data show people who once had a SARS-CoV-2 infection were much less likely than never-infected, vaccinated people to get Delta, develop symptoms from it, or become hospitalized with serious COVID-19. The study demonstrates the power of the human immune system, but infectious disease experts emphasized that this vaccine and others for COVID-19 nonetheless remain highly protective against severe disease and death. And they caution that intentional infection among unvaccinated people would be extremely risky.

BOMBSHELL UK data destroys entire premise for vaccine push

 

Read original article.

To be specific

From the 1st of February to the 2nd of August, the UK recorded 742 Delta deaths . Out of the 742 deaths, 402 were fully vaccinated. Only 253 were unvaccinated. They will not acknowledge the clear science that people with natural immunity, and the young and healthy, do not need to take the risks of these injections.

Horowitz: 15 studies that indicate natural immunity from prior infection is more robust than the COVID vaccines

Dr_Microbe/Getty Images

 

Read original article.

It’s the 800-pound gorilla in the pandemic. The debate over forced vaccination with an ever-waning vaccine is cresting right around the time when the debate should be moot for a lot of people. Among the most fraudulent messages of the CDC’s campaign of deceit is to force the vaccine on those with prior infection, who have a greater degree of protection against all versions of the virus than those with any of the vaccines. It’s time to set the record straight once and for all that natural immunity to SARS-CoV-2 is broader, more durable, and longer-lasting than any of the shots on the market today. Our policies must reflect that reality.

Sabrina Maddeaux: Sorry Trudeau, thinking about monetary policy is thinking about families

Inflation hit 3.7 per cent in July. PHOTO BY BRENT LEWIN/BLOOMBERG FILES

 

These decisions will hugely impact families’ ability to afford everything from groceries to housing, as well as their ability to pay down debts and mortgages

The first week of Trudeau’s campaign hasn’t exactly been smooth sailing, but perhaps his biggest unforced error was saying he «doesn’t think about monetary policy.» The comment was in response to a question about the rising cost of living and whether he’d change the Bank of Canada’s mandate when it expires at the end of this year. While the Bank of Canada is a crown corporation that operates independently of the federal government, it’s mandate, which includes inflation targets and whether it should consider things like employment rates and climate change, comes up for renewal every five years. That it’s set for review in the midst of what Trudeau himself calls such a «pivotal» time should make it a priority. Supposedly thinking about families ahead of monetary policy is utter nonsense.

Vaccine Mandates and the «Great Reset»

Read original article.

While the vaccinated in some countries are getting back some of their freedoms taken away by the covid interventions, the unvaccinated are not so well off.

To answer these questions, it is necessary to analyze the prevalent vaccination narrative and ask who benefits from it. In doing so, the alliance of interests between the state, the media, the pharmaceutical industry, and supranational institutions must be addressed. Let us start with the pharmaceutical industry. It has an obvious economic interest in the vaccination campaign.